Per section 76 of the Copyright Act, 2005 - folklore" means the literary, artistic and scientific expressions belonging to the cultural heritage of Ghana which are created, preserved and developed by ethnic communities of Ghana or by an unidentified Ghanaian author, and includes kente and Adinkra designs, where the author of the designs are not known, and any similar work designated under this Act to be works of folklore.
As defined in the UNESCO Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore (1989), “folklore (or traditional and popular culture) is the totality of tradition-based creations, of a cultural community, expressed by a group or individuals and recognized as reflecting the expectations of a community in so far as they reflect its cultural and social identity; its standards and values are transmitted orally, by imitation or by other means. Its forms are, among others, language, literature, music, dance, games, mythology, rituals, customs, handicrafts, architecture and other arts.”
The Copyright Act, 2005 (Act 690) specifies that the rights in folklore are vested in the President on behalf of and in trust for the people of the Republic. It also states that a person who seeks to use folklore outside the scope permitted by section 19 of the Act must seek permission from the National Folklore Board. Personal use, news reportage and use for educational purposes do not require permission.
Any person who intends to use expressions of folklore for commercial purposes and any purpose other than as permitted under Act 690, is required to apply to the National Folklore Board for permission for the use and to pay the applicable fees as prescribed by the National Folklore Board.
The National Folklore Board has neither sued nor expressed an immediate intention of suing the producers of Black Panther. Our law specifies that a person who seeks to use a Ghanaian expression of folklore must seek permission from the Folklore Board.
The focus is not one particular unauthorized user. The National Folklore Board has identified institutions in Ghana and abroad, using our Adinkra symbols, kente and other expressions of folklore for commercial purposes and outside the customary context. We have also reached out to the relevant embassies (including China) and Ministries to assist with the textile issue as it is more complex in identifying the manufacturers.
At the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) Intergovernmental Committee meetings, the general consensus is that there is the need for countries especially developing countries to protect their folklore. There are many countries that have benefited from protection of their traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions such as Australia through the art of the Aboriginals, Italy through its strict geographical indications regime protecting foods such as Modena vinegar, Barolo wine, etc., Champagne in France where all champagne comes from and Ethiopia for its coffee.
It will interest you to know that currently Starbucks acknowledges its coffee made with coffee beans from Ethiopia and they have a benefits sharing arrangement with top coffee companies including Starbucks which has greatly improved the lives of coffee farmers in Ethiopia. The same is being done by the Masai people of Kenya who benefit sharing arrangements for commercial use of their Masai cloth by multinational companies.
The National Folklore Board has been in existence since 2005. Currently, there are twenty two (22) companies that have duly sought permission. These include Vodafone Ghana Limited, Scancom PLC (MTN), Databank Ghana, Accra Brewery Limited, etc.
Yes, there is the urgent need for Ghana to protect our folklore particularly our kente (the designs and the traditional knowledge of kente weaving) and our Adinkra symbols. Over the past few months, there has been advocacy, by experts and other relevant stakeholders for the need to protect our kente, Adinkra symbols and other expressions of folklore.
For the past 20 years, WIPO (World Intellectual Propety Organisation) member states have been deliberating on an international legally binding instrument to protect traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions (folklore). The general consensus has been that the existing Intellectual Property rights cannot effectively protect traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. This is due to factors such as term of protection, requirements of originality, national definitions of public domain, etc.
In as much as Ghana may get some compensation from this initiative (of which a law suit is the last resort), the primary goal in these instances is to ensure that our expressions of folklore are not misused or denigrated.
There is a famous American series in which Ananse is being invoked as a spirit and one movie in which Kevin Hart refers to himself as a Nigerian Prince even though he was adorned in Kente. These misrepresentations could have been avoided if they had sought the requisite permission.
It may be true that Ghana stands to gain some advantage from the "advertisement" that these foreign interests give to us by using our folklore. However there are equally many dangers associated with not asserting our rights in these expressions of folklore. A typical example is the Hakuna Matata case. Hakuna Matata has recently been copyrighted by Disney even though it is a Swahili phrase which means no worries. Now the Copyright Office of Kenya has raised an objection to this. Unfortunately they face serious challenges because Disney has trademarked the expression. How many people even know it’s a Swahili expression from Kenya?
There is the risk of misrepresentation or inappropriate usage of our folklore, if we do not insist on this need for permission by foreign interests. In the movie Ride along 2, Kevin Hart beautifully adorned in kente refers to himself as a Nigerian prince. Today there is a needless debate as to whether or not Azonto is Ghanaian or Nigerian and this is because we sometimes fail to assert our ownership rights over what belongs to us.
The National Folklore Board has put out a press release by way of notice to unauthorized users of folklore. We also have a “Did You Know” Series (Infographics) on the law on folklore and have granted many TV and radio interviews.
However, the National Folklore Board requires support of the media to ensure that we project what is ours and create the needed awareness.
The Copyright Act, 2005 specifically mentions kente and Adinkra symbols as part of the folklore of Ghana.
The National Folklore Board is well aware of the competing claims to kente by our neighbouring countries. However this does not stop us from laying claim to what is ours. In the event that any of our neighbors raise a competing claim we can consolidate our claims into one and share the benefits that accrue to us for commercial exploitation of our kente.
Admittedly, there are instances where two countries may claim ownership of an expression of folklore.
In such instance, ARIPO (African Regional Intellectual Property Organization) may be entrusted with settling concurrent ownership claims from communities of different countries.